By Peter McKenzie-Brown
This novel by American academic George Saunders received the
Man Booker prize last year. And I should begin by saying that the reviews I
have read – in The Guardian, the New York Times, and the Globe and Mail – are extremely positive.
Lincoln in the Bardo received critical acclaim, and Time magazine named
Saunders, who teaches at Syracuse University, one of the 100 most influential
people in the world.
Personally, I found this avant-garde book a challenge to finish.
These comments explain why, but also why it makes sense to persevere.
There
are two things you need to know to understand this book. The first is that
Abraham Lincoln’s 11-year-old son Willie died of typhoid in 1862, as the Civil
War was raging and while his father was hosting a party downstairs in the White
House. The second is the notion of the Bardo, which in Tibetan Buddhism is a transitional
reality that people endure between death and rebirth. It is a concept which
arose soon after Gautama Buddha’s death in 545 BC. The Bardo is an intermediate
state between death and rebirth, and a central theme of one of the earliest
Buddhist texts, the Tibetan Book of the
Dead.
According to Tibetan tradition,
after death and before one’s next birth, when one’s consciousness is not
connected with a physical body, he or she experiences a variety of phenomena.
These usually follow a particular sequence of degeneration. Just after death,
the spirit has its clearest experiences of reality. Eventually in the Bardo,
you have hallucinations and nightmares. For the lucky ones, it’s a place of transcendental
insight. If that’s your experience, you may be reincarnated as an enlightened
one.
As Saunders says in his copyright
page, his book is “a work of historical fiction. Apart from the well-known
actual people, events and locales that figure into the narrative, all names,
characters, places, and incidents are products of the author’s imagination or
are used fictitiously.” The book takes countless forms. In effect, it’s a
collage of comments, dialogues and opinions offered by spirits, ghosts and
other spectres. The text looks a bit like the pages of a printed play – but a
play in which the ghosts are those of loveless old men, abused women (most
tragically, a “mulatto” woman, who had been frequently raped), racists and
suicides. The apparitions in this book lived tragic lives or died tragic
deaths, or both.
One of the novel’s conceits is that
by occupying the same space, the spirits can experience dissolution of
interpersonal boundaries, understanding and feeling sympathy for each other in
a mystical way. Among the book’s restless phantoms are two who most closely
resemble the story’s protagonists. Their names are Hans Vollman and Roger
Bevins III.
“When the ghost of the young Willie
Lincoln appears in the Bardo, these two and sometimes their colleague, the
Reverend Everly Thomas, attempt to liberate the boy’s spirit from existence in
the Bardo” John Semley wrote in a Globe and Mail book review. “To do this, they
must deliver the boy’s ghost to Lincoln himself, uniting the boy’s spectral
death-form with his father’s physical body, as a way of easing his grief.”
In one of the concluding chapters, a
mob of spirits enter Lincoln’s body as he strides through the cemetery. They
wedge themselves into his mourning. And the experience proves fruitful in the
odd sense that it deepens Lincoln’s sense of mourning. “He had not, it seemed,
gone unaffected by that event. Not at all. It had made him sad. Sadder. We had.
All of us, white and black, had made him sadder, with our sadness.” The notion,
according to Semley, is “that sadness teaches us compassion, our misery making
us more mindful of others.”
In the darkness of that cemetery,
Lincoln realizes that his own grief has already been endured by tens of thousands
of fathers and mothers across the country. On the one hand, he could give up;
on the other, he could turn that sorrow into a renewed determination to bring
the national crisis to conclusion. Finally, he realizes that “though on the
surface it seemed every person was different, this was not true….Whatever way
one took in this world, one must try to remember that all were suffering (none
content; all wronged, neglected, overlooked, misunderstood), and therefore one
must do what one could to lighten the load of those with whom one came into
contact.”
As I mentioned at the beginning of these
remarks, this book is unusual and, given its plethora of voices, difficult to
follow. After I’d finished the book and started to read the reviews, I downloaded
the audiobook, which uses a different person to voice each of the book’s 166
different characters. I didn’t and won’t listen to the whole book, but I wish I
had done it this way in the beginning.
* Buddha left no written texts behind. The many Buddhist documents attributed to
him were composed after his death. Groups of monks kept them alive through
chanting before scribes eventually put pen to paper and wrote them down.
No comments:
Post a Comment