In the early years, a blowout showed that the oil industry had hit the big time
By Peter McKenzie-Brown
To put the extent of the prosperity generated by the discovery of oil in Alberta in 1947, in that agriculture contributed $555 million to the provincial economy – directly and
indirectly, through exports. By contrast, petroleum’s contribution was only $35
million. By 1956, the petroleum industry contributed $690 million, compared to
$635 million from agriculture.
Especially in the beginning, conflict arose between a
gung-ho petroleum industry and an agricultural community concerned about
encroachments on its landholdings. Alberta’s farmers became the petroleum
industry’s “harshest critics,” said Erik Lizée. “Alberta farmers responded
aggressively to the surface rights issue, but were betrayed by a provincial
government focused myopically on establishing and nurturing an emergent
petroleum industry.”
“To understand the farmer’s concerns, something must be said
of the process of extracting oil and gas,” Lizée said. “It is, first and
foremost, a messy affair. Simply to drill an oil well requires the clearing of
(often fertile crop) land, the cutting of roads, the transportation of drilling
equipment, the digging of the sump pit, and the erection of the derrick,
coupled with the arrival of the drilling crew.
The provincial response was the passing of the 1947 Right of Entry
Arbitration Act. This legislation was essentially a cynical attempt by the
province to provide the petroleum industry with access to surface rights that
recalcitrant farmers were unwilling to provide voluntarily, Lizée said. The Act
provided for the creation of a Right of Entry Board – a quasi-judicial agency
to protect farmers.
This system had flaws, he added. “For farmers to have
been ‘protected’ by the Board, they would have had to refuse any interaction with
an oil company representative that could be construed as a contract, and then
wait for the oil company to apply to the Right of Entry Board. If…a farmer had
reached any kind of ‘understanding’ with an oil operator, the Act would not
apply and the only recourse for an individual farmer would be to turn to the
courts.” The petroleum industry’s large financial reserves and legal expertise
made recourse a waste of resources for farmers, enabling oil and gas companies
to “circumvent the minimal protection afforded farmers by the Act.”
A year after the Right of Entry Act received Royal assent,
the agricultural community got a glimpse of how bad things can get. In March
1948, drillers on the Atlantic Leduc #3 well lost mud circulation in the top of
the reef, and the well blew wild. Drilling by Frank McMahon’s Atlantic
Petroleum Company “had barely punched into the main producing reservoir a mile
below the surface when a mighty surge of pressure shot the drilling mud up
through the pipe and 150 feet into the air,” wrote historian Earle Gray.
As the ground shook and a high-pitched roar issued from the well, the mud was followed by a great, dirty plume of oil and gas that splattered the snow-covered ground. Drillers pumped several tons of drilling mud down the hole, and after thirty-eight hours the wild flow was sealed off, but not for long. Some 2,800 feet below the surface, the drill pipe had broken off, and through this break the pressure of the reservoir forced oil and gas into shallower formations. As the pressure built up, the oil and gas were forced to the surface through crevices and cracks. Geysers of mud, oil, and gas spouted out of the ground in hundreds of craters over a ten-acre area around the well.
It took six months, two relief wells and the injection of
700,000 barrels of river water to bring the well under control. Cleanup efforts
recovered almost 1.4 million barrels of oils in a series of ditches and
gathering pools. At one point the well caught fire, and the crew worked
frantically for 59 hours to snuff out the blaze. The size of the blowout, and
the cleanup operation added to the legend. Soon the developed world knew from
newsreels and photo features of the blowout that the words “oil” and “Alberta”
were inseparable.
The Rebus Affair
“You promised me this drilling would not interfere with
farming,” complained John Rebus, whose mother owned the farm on which the
blowout took place. “Look at the land. It’s covered with oil. It’s all
ruined.”
Bronislaw and Rose Rebus had acquired the land and mineral
rights when they arrived from Poland in 1897 to farm. Under the terms of
Bronislaw’s will, his widow owned the land but John – the eldest of his six
sons – held title to the property’s mineral rights. This was unknown to
Imperial Oil, which – expanding its land holdings around its Leduc discovery –
had negotiated a lease for mineral rights on her property with Rose Rebus.
When he learned about this legal dichotomy, industry
entrepreneur Frank McMahon sensed opportunity. He took John Rebus to Calgary to
keep him safely away from Imperial Oil and its land agents. According to
historian Earle Gray, Rebus “wasn’t keen on leasing the oil rights, all he
wanted to do was keep on farming, and he didn’t want an oil company with its
big drilling rig, its trucks and heavy equipment messing up his land.” McMahon
spent a week in negotiations with Rebus, who accepted $200,000 cash plus a
12.5-percent production royalty for his mineral rights. McMahon then persuaded
Imperial to drop its uncertain interest in the lease in return for 100,000
barrels of oil from future production.
For his mineral rights, Rebus eventually received
$366,544.17 in royalty payments – a huge sum in those days. The Oil and Gas
Conservation Board took over project management for cleaning up his land. After
a great deal of remediation, some of the land could be farmed again, although the scars of Alberta's greatest
oilfield disaster are still evident in the bald patches in the fields where the
Atlantic Leduc, which is now a historic site, blew wild.
This incident served as an alert to farmers across the
province. After all, most farmers owned surface rights only. Unlike John Rebus,
they would not receive royalties for such a disaster.
Entrepreneur Frank McMahon represented prevailing views within
Alberta’s expanding energy industry. In 1954 he was head of a group applying
for a permit to construct the Westcoast natural gas pipeline, which eventually
transported natural gas from Alberta to markets in BC’s lower mainland and the
United States. “Our minerals, our water power, our forests, and our oil and gas
land must be developed and utilized before we can reap the benefits they hold
in store,” he wrote to the US Federal Pipeline Commission in his company’s
application. “We have everything to gain from the application of sound common
sense in the development of all our natural resources.” When counsel asked
whether that statement was true, he said “Yes sir. I can hardly believe I wrote
it, it’s so good.”
No comments:
Post a Comment