Baytex Energy has been developing heavy oil for more than two decades, and has the assets—people and oil—to stay in the game for the long run
This article appears in the December issue of Oilweek
By Peter McKenzie-Brown
The new kid on the oilpatch’s executive
block is Jim Bowzer, who left his position as a production vice president for
Marathon Oil Corporation to take the top job at Baytex Energy Corp. in
September. Baytex is a pretty heavy hitter; in mid-October, shortly after Oilweek’s Supplier of the Year voting
ended, the intermediate company’s market capitalization stood at around the
$5.7-billion mark. That means the company was big enough to recruit a
high-achiever from Houston-based Marathon Oil.
“By the asset mix that Baytex had, I
knew it was a good fit,” Bowzer says of his decision to make the move. “In
addition to growth and paying a healthy dividend, I was impressed because it’s
a company that executes well on discovered assets.”
Before being recruited, Bowzer (a
petroleum engineer by background) spent most of his career in the petroleum
sector. Prior to joining Baytex, he was North American production operations
vice-president for the venerable Marathon Oil—a company whose roots go back 125
years. To put the major’s legacy status into context, Marathon was once part of
John D. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil Trust. Its longevity notwithstanding,
though, at present the company’s market cap is only about three times that of
Baytex.
Although he liked Baytex’s asset mix,
Bowzer adds there was very little overlap with the assets he managed for
Marathon. “However, I have done the same kind of development in many basins in
the United States. I spent the majority of my career working on conventional
onshore assets.”
Growing
up
In the two decades since Baytex became
a public company, says Ray Chan, the company’s executive chairman, it has
followed business models that have reflected changing times. The company never
followed the model used by operators who “start a company, grow it, sell it to
a larger entity in and then start all over again,” he says.
Through its first decade as a publicly
traded company, Baytex promised growth, but didn’t pay a dividend. Then, Chan
says, “We became part of the income trust craze. That offered a tax-efficient
income stream for investors. [In terms of] distribution plus capital
appreciation, we were one of the best operators out there.” Of course, income
trusts collapsed with the federal government’s infamous “Halloween Massacre” of
2006, which effectively proscribed the business model.
Under the new rules, Baytex switched
back to the corporate model in 2010. No longer, though, is it an entity that
promises growth. The company focuses now on “moderate growth plus dividend
income,” says Chan. The company steadily increased its dividends from 2009 to
2011, and now pays 22 cents per month. Enthusiastic almost to a fault, Chan
says the results are clear: “The Baytex income stream is [still] one of the
best out there.” And it focuses on organic growth—increasing production from
existing land assets.
A chartered accountant with three
decades of direct oil and gas experience, Chan explains the lure of creating an
attractive income stream for investors.
“I look at the bottom-line results,” he
says. “When you have a smaller capital budget, you put your investment capital
into the best-return projects. You high-grade them. This has made us much more
disciplined in our capital investment. By being more selective in our capital
investment, we are being better stewards of our shareholders’ capital.”
Then comes the tour de force. Chan pulls out a chart prepared by
Scotia Capital comparing profit investment ratios (PIR) for the top 50 resource
plays in North America. To calculate the PIR, which is a critical measure of
the success of a company’s investments, divide the present value of its future
cash flows by initial investment.
“We are involved in two of the top
three plays,” Chan says enthusiastically. On closer study, though, he actually
understated the case. Using Scotia Capital’s calculations for reference, Baytex
does indeed have a presence in two of North America’s top three resource plays.
One of those plays, at Seal in the Peace River oil sands, involves cold
production from multilateral wells (#1). Another involves vertical heavy oil wells in the Lloydminster area (#3). What he
neglected to mention is that the company’s other major producing areas are also
near the top: a heavy oil project at Lloydminster using horizontal wells (#7) and another project at Redwater Viking (#10).
These results put Baytex in the industry’s top quintile.
An obvious feature of this list is that
the company decided early on to focus on oily assets. According to Chan,
“almost 80 per cent of our production is heavy oil, and the larger part of our
growth opportunities is there too. The Bakken portion of the light oil is
growing as well. We have some SAGD [steam assisted gravity drainage] projects,
too. Some of our [oilsands] assets have lower viscosity. This can bring a
better return to our shareholders” since it is producible without the need for
steam. Like other producers, Baytex “isn’t pouring a lot of money into natural
gas.”
This fall Baytex announced a
$120-million acquisition that illustrates the company’s growth strategy. The
acquisition gave Baytex a 100 per cent working interest in 46 sections of
undeveloped oilsands leases near Cold Lake. According to a company news
release, these assets “are prospective for both thermal and cold development.
Regulatory approval has been received for the construction and operation of a
two-stage bitumen recovery scheme using steam assisted gravity drainage.” The
company plans to begin steaming the SAGD wells next year. If successful, the
company will develop a commercial SAGD project, which would begin producing in
2016.
The acquisition adds an approved SAGD
project to Baytex’s asset portfolio, which currently includes thermal recovery
projects at Seal in the Peace River oilsands region and in southwestern
Saskatchewan. Once developed, thermal recovery projects provide a source of
long-life, low-decline production. Developing these projects will reduce our
corporate decline rate and enhance our ability to continue to execute our
growth and income model over the long term.
In the years since Baytex took the
plunge into heavy oil, the commodity “has become a much more acceptable and
profitable business,” according to Chan. “But you can’t just be a part-time
heavy oil player. You have to really focus on that, and we have done for quite
a while. We have learned how to manage the heavy oil business, [and] we have
some competitive advantages.”
Chan is a master of the spicy quote.
“We’re not interested in getting bigger,” he says. “We are interested in being
better. Sometimes when you get to a bigger size, it makes moving that bigger
mass more difficult.” He signed off with a message for the future that has
certainly worked well for the years since he joined the Baytex board. “Over the
next 10 years, I’d rather be long oil than short oil,” he chuckles.
Differentials
As a Marathon executive, Jim Bowzer
rarely gave a thought to the seasonal price differentials that plague Canada’s
oil producers, but now that he has joined the clan he is sanguine about the
problem. For one thing, it just makes sense for Canadians to price their heavier
oils using the Western Canadian Select oil benchmark. That pricing arrangement
reflects the value to refiners of a blend of heavy conventional and bitumen
crude oils combined with sweet synthetic and condensate diluents. It trades at
a discount—a differential—to West Texas Intermediate (WTI) because of the
higher cost of refining the stuff.
“The transportation system is affecting
northern oils disproportionately,” Bowzer acknowledges, and “there’s plenty of
room for new [pipeline] capacity out there, and the cost of entry is not out of
line.”
He stresses the cyclical nature of the
oil price differentials. “There tend to be differentials for Canadian oils in
the spring, but during the year they work themselves out.”
In the longer term, he says, “pipeline
networks will get built out, and that will help balance the WTI price versus
the ocean-bound markers like Brent. There is a huge gap between the amount of
oil the United States needs and the amount it produces, [and] what will happen
over time is that the United States will focus increasingly on oil from North
America, and less on oil that it can bring in by ship from overseas. There will
be more pipelines to the south. There are lots of northern oils, like the
Bakken, and they’re all in the same boat….”
Maybe not the same boat, since Canadian
oil still lacks easy access to tidewater. However, many of those oils are now
in tanker cars.
“Rail [transportation] has opened up a
doorway that just wasn’t there before,” according to Bowzer. “As the world has
adjusted itself to heavier and sourer oils, refineries have installed a lot of
units for refining those oil products. For example, on the Gulf coast they use
a lot of Mayan oil [which is similar to Canadian heavy.] It consistently sells
at a premium to West Texas intermediate. That’s [one of the factors] driving
rail transportation all the way to the south. Oil transportation and delivery
now feeds into a very sophisticated market.”
So does oil trading: Baytex hedges
sales to reduce risk.
Greatest
strengths
Ask these two executives about their
company’s greatest strengths, and the answers are fairly predictable: assets
and people.
“We have as good a group of people as
any other heavy oil company in town,” says Chan, noting that the company has
about 350 employees—“about half in Calgary and half in the field. People and
assets are our top two things. It was our people that led to our business model
and our asset quality.”
“What Baytex needs is our asset base,”
Bowzer adds, before pausing for a few moments. “Baytex has assets and people
that are outstanding. We also have a tremendous, interactive board of
directors, and the combination of those things has made for a very successful
history.”
“The Baytex story is unique, our
industry is unique,” says Chan. “We’ve been a participant long enough in the
Calgary space that we have something important to say.”
No comments:
Post a Comment